Sunday, June 23, 2013

Just Another Day in the Hood

 

On Saturday morning (June 22, 2013) at 5:30 a.m. about a dozen people were standing in line outside a local store that sells gear for trendy young people.  A man walked up to the group, pulled a gun, and told them to hand over the no less than $180 they were waiting in line for 6 1/2 more hours to spend on the new Nike LeBron X EXT.

What is a Nike LeBron X EXT, you might ask?  It’s a sneaker.  It’s a shoe.  It’s an urban lure designed by Nike to create buzz and, eventually, tragedy, in order to market their ugly, overpriced footwear.

Nike LeBron X EXT

Well, guess what happened?  One of the customers waiting in line also had a concealed weapon and he pulled it.  He fired, fatally wounding the idiot bandit.

AND THEN HE GOT BACK IN  LINE AND WAITED THERE UNTIL THE STORE OPENED!

Yes, of course, the police were called and they arrived with an ambulance to remove the deceased.  No further details about the shooter and the shot have been released yet, but the shooter was allowed to stay in line and the police are saying it was self-defense.  Of course, there are plenty of witnesses to support that.  Besides, the shooter had a license to carry.

Six months ago, in the subdivision my sister lives in, a freshman boy was followed home by a group of thugs.  They entered the house where the boy was home alone – his father was due within 30 minutes.  The thugs hog-tied the freshman and shot him in the head.  The child died instantly.

Why?

Sneakers.  Shoes. 

The boy had a collection of high-end sneakers that pre-dated the ones above, but which had been marketed the same way.  The manufacturers release them to extremely limited outlets, in numbers too few to meet the demand. 

As I mentioned, the price tag on these new fishing lures is $180.  Here’s what I found on eBay today:

Nike LeBron X EXT on eBay

Your thoughts?

Saturday, June 22, 2013

It’s Been a Rough Day for Undercover Bigots

 

There was a time when even a person as famous as Paula Deen could be sued by an employee, reach a settlement/hush money agreement and carry on with nothing lost but a hefty pile of cash.

To quote some grammatically challenged person from the past, “Them days is gone forever.”

The news of the last couple of weeks, with the government seeming to care who I talk to on the phone – which, by the way, is a colossal waste of time, since I speak on the phone about once a week, if that – and an article I saw somewhere that asserted the government can spy on us in every room in our house if they are so inclined, is starting to make me feel as if the world is literally closing in on me.

The illusion of privacy is dying hard, but it is dying.  All one has to do is pay attention to the way personal online viewing habits are monitored in order to target you, specifically, with their relentless marketing.  If you are stupid enough to try to get away with killing your spouse or robbing a bank, if the surveillance cameras don’t nail you, the pings on your cell phone will. 

GPS has been repeatedly and variously marketed to consumers as a convenience for finding their ways to anywhere they want or need to go.  The truth is that GPS is a tracking device that follows your electronic device with the GPS feature activated everywhere you carry it.  I no longer have to wonder where on the globe my jet-setting son happens to be on any given day.  All I have to do a read his latest Facebook message – FB lets me know he is somewhere near Oakland or New York City.

Paula Deen has been literally taken down by today’s technology.  There are millions of people all over the world who now know that underneath all that smarmy, chicken-fried charm of her is a person nobody would recognize. 

Paula Deen insists that she and her family only used the n-word if it was not in a mean way.  Say what?  On what planet is there an acceptable context for the use of this word by Paula Deen?  

Here are just two quotes from the deposition that blow the lid off any pretense of her being misunderstood:

“The whole entire waiter staff was middle-aged black men, and they had on beautiful white jackets with a black bow tie. I mean, it was really impressive. That restaurant represented a certain era in America… after the Civil War, during the Civil War, before the Civil War… It was not only black men, it was black women… I would say they were slaves.”

About the alleged racist jokes, Paula explained:

“It’s just what they are — they’re jokes…most jokes are about Jewish people, rednecks, black folks…I can’t determine what offends another person.”

Another allegation against Deen’s brother, Bubba Hiers, who runs one of the family’s restaurants in Savannah, GA, is that Hiers required black employees and white employees to use separate bathrooms. 

I hear there are people who think Paula’s firing from The Food Network this afternoon seems to be an overreaction.  After all, they are saying, Deen is 66 years old and is a product of a different time.  Aren’t we all?  I would love to be a fly on the wall when Paula Deen has to explain herself to her pal Oprah.  I’m pretty sure Oprah would have expected Paula to learn a few things about right and wrong since 1946.  I know I do.

I had a daydream earlier about Malcolm X sitting wherever he ended up in the afterlife looking upon the events of today with a pretty undeniable smirk on his face.  I heard chickens clucking in the background. 

Don’t understand?  Click here.

Monday, June 17, 2013

Why We Can’t Shut Up About Race

 

See, hear, speak no evil

The way I know I am getting somewhere in a conversation about race is when one or more of the people in the discussion start squirming or trying to change the subject.

Then and only then is when there is the teeny-tiniest chance of persuasion.  That discomfort signals, to me anyway, a conflict within the person.  It signals something called cognitive dissonance, which occurs when an individual finds herself holding two conflicting beliefs.  It means something I’ve said has broken through the resistance and landed a point that actually makes sense to the person. 

There is a great reluctance to talk about racial issues in America, especially on the parts of some members of the dominant group.  In my experience, even those who are trying to be open-minded and truly want the effects of American racism to simply vaporize, become uncomfortable at some point in the conversation.

Why is that?

I believe it is because of collective guilt.

In my opinion, there are two categories of this feeling of guilt that sets in for members of the dominant group because of the harm their group has caused to the oppressed group:

Those who don’t want to hear it; and those who don’t know how to deal with it.

The first group is defensive.  They are adept at accusing others of “playing the race card,” as if the very suggestion of a racial component to a chain of events is considered unfair game play.  They are the people who, instead of considering the validity of such possibilities, tend to suggest we stop looking back at the history of black and brown people on this continent and start getting those “others” to think and behave like what they call “real Americans.”  Enough already, they say.  The past is the past.  We’re sorry! OK?!?!  Now get up off your black or brown butts and start pulling your weight the way we do!

The second group includes a good number of my online friends and fellow writers who are white.  They know the racism is still here.  They know it is extremely harmful – for the individual, for the family, for the town, city, state and nation.  They even know they will never fully “get” what it feels like to not be white.  And at some point in the conversation, many will feel so weary from not knowing what to do about the problems, they suggest we end the conversation.

More than once I have seen comments on blog post threads that express exasperation with all the posts written about race.  They say they choose to read and discuss happier things, things that aren’t so potentially explosive.  They say they are disgusted by some of the vitriol that such posts seem to generate, so they are avoiding future posts on the subject like the plague.

 RELIGION…POLITICS…RACE = off limits in polite conversation.

But not all conversations need to be polite.  Some conversations – the ones that are most likely to get problems solved – need to get down and dirty in order to reach a successful and permanent solution.  Refusing to think about, much less talk about racism does nothing whatsoever to ameliorate the broad gaps in understanding about social problems in the U.S.

It is no longer enough to simply know within your heart that, as a white person, you are absolutely without racial prejudice, which makes you a non-racist.  Being a non-racist is good; it’s just not good enough.  It’s not enough to stay on the sidelines avoiding conflict knowing you are not guilty of racist thoughts and behaviors.

What’s needed in this country today is a movement to transform non-racists into outspoken and passionate anti-racism activists.  No matter how much a person believes he is not part of the problem, failure to speak out against the rancid racist outbursts that result from things like the recent interracial ad for Cheerios keeps him from being part of the solution.

We cannot change the history of black and brown people in America.  It happened and it is disgraceful.  You, the reader, didn’t do any of it.  Neither did I.  But that doesn’t mean we are not responsible for fixing the aftermath, which lingers relentlessly century after century. 

True, some of the discussions here and on other blog sites get painfully heated.  You might feel like you can’t relate to the positions some of the commenters take.  That’s fine.  That’s to be expected.  What matters is what you decide to do about the discomfort these exchanges cause you.  Will you retreat to a safer and less-stressful corner and refuse to read further?  Or will you expose your true feelings to the light of day and participate in the conversation?

Oh, I am acutely aware of the gamesmanship that goes on here, with people trying to razzle dazzle their opponents with verbal gymnastics.   You might think it is necessary for you to respond in kind, but it’s not.  It is only necessary for you to go on record as to what you believe to be true. 

The rabid racists who like to invade a comment thread spewing shock and awe while they hide behind their avatars and their computer screens are getting far more national attention then those of us who sincerely believe we can come together in a way that will shut those racists up and sit their racist butts down.

Let’s continue to talk about it.  Let’s not shut up.

Friday, June 14, 2013

Quadroon

 

Pull up a chair, sit on the floor and let your feet hang.

I want to tell you a story about a conflicted woman who lived in strange times.  This woman made a lot of mistakes and lots of enemies, and although nearly 90, she may never understand how and where she lost her way.

I call her Mama.

I tell people she is a white woman who married a black man and had two daughters.  According to American conventions of racial determination, that’s not exactly the truth -- but it’s not a lie either. 

My mother looks white and thinks white a lot of the time. She worked in “Whites Only” places of employment during all of my formative years following my birth in late 1944.

According to American racial convention, however, my mother is a quadroon.

As I described at length in a post about the history of my home town, my mother’s paternal grandparents moved from Ohio to what was then a vast expanse of fertile Illinois farm land in the mid-to-late 1890s.  It was about 18 miles west of downtown Chicago.

Grandma Eva Harris* was white and her roots were in Surrey, England or thereabouts.  Grandpa Iva Harris, my mother would always say, was as black as the Ace of Spades.  His roots were also in Europe because was a descendant of Moors.

My mother’s family is now known as the first black family to live in that suburb -– yes, even though my great-mother was just as white as the woman on the next homestead.  Thus it was so:  the one drop rule of race applied not just to the progeny of American slaves, but to any person with so-called Negroid features and skin color.

The 19th century Harrises had seven children.  There was one for every color on the skin-tone spectrum.  They youngest son, Royal, was one of the two sons who came out looking like their mother.  Most people assumed they were Jews because of their prominent noses and wavy hair. 

Young Royal married a very young Mabel Dade.  Grandma Mabel Harris had been abandoned by her Czech mother, who was born in Prague, and her full-blooded Native American father,  whose excuse for that abandonment was never explained.  Grandma Mabel inherited all her looks from her mother and was raised as a white woman.  She was beautiful.  Her hazel eyes changed from green to blue-green to gray and almost amber.  Her light brown hair hung to the base of her spine in two braids – unless she was going to work at the factory or out shopping, when she would create a coronet from the braids on the top of her lovely head.

My mother entered their world in October 1924.  It was clear from the start she was to be a beauty.  Her thick black hair was naturally wavy, her skin the color of milk.  Eighteen months later, a little brother with blonde curls and green eyes made his debut.  And that’s what started the story of my own life.

Recently, my mother admitted how she had resented that baby brother for looking the way he did.  I doubt she fully understands how relevant that has been to the course her life took, but I know it was.

It must have been so confusing for that little girl with the spindly legs who would grow to be 5’8 1/2 '” as an adult.  She looked as white as any of the children at her school did. And yet, because of her ebony-colored grandfather, with whom they lived for several of their early years, she was restricted in the same ways that other black children were going to be as their families found their ways into Maywood.

The public schools soon became segregated.  One grammar school was designated for the children residing in the few square blocks allotted as suitable for colored people.  There was no choice involved – my lily white mother went to the colored grammar school where she was instantly despised.  But she was a smart little thing and soon became a favorite among the teachers. 

My mother’s statuesque beauty blossomed just in time for high school.  The high school served a collection of surrounding towns, so the student body was naturally integrated.  There were WASPs from the Lutheran School, Italians from the town just southwest of Maywood, lots of Irish from the two Catholic Schools in the area and assorted other, mostly European representatives.  My mother’s exotic beauty was not lost on any of those white teenage boys, but she was not allowed to respond to their attention. 

When the time came for dating, she could only accept the invitations of black boys.  That made the black girls despise her even more.  The understandable identity crisis my mother suffered created conflict in the family.  She was jealous of her brother’s closeness with their mother.  Her father, whom she adored, was too often more interested in finding the bottom of a wine bottle than in her growing pains.

So, when a handsome and extremely smart black man from the West Side of Chicago asked for her hand in marriage when she was only 17, she jumped at the chance.  Love?  What’s love got to do with it?  This bronze-colored black man was her ticket out of hell – or so she thought. This champion swimmer who excelled in the technical courses he had taken at Chicago Vocational School was the man who became my birth father.

Sunday’s coming Father’s Day has been heavy on my mind.  None of them are still living, but I wound up having four of them.  They were all black.  They were all decent men, although one struggled with alcoholism, just like my Grandpa.  That was the one who molested me.

But none of them could please my mother for very long, because the most surprising thing of all was that she had become a racist.  Yes, that’s what I said – she was and still is to some extent a racist who resents black people.

Because my mother’s marriage habit kept leaving us fatherless, she had no choice but to work.  Fortunately, she had studied typing and stenography in high school and attended a couple of years of college, so it was easy for her to find work in the Chicago Loop as a legal secretary.  It was easy as long as she allowed her bosses and co-workers to believe she was white. 

My mother’s struggles as a quadroon (this term is no longer used in common conversation) resulted in some lifelong scars, not just on her, but on my sister and me as well.  We weren’t allowed to visit her offices downtown because that would blow her “cover.”  Is there any wonder I believed she was ashamed of us, that there was something inherently wrong with our personhood?  Intellectually, I know she did what she had to do; she didn’t have much choice.  But emotionally?  It stung and sadly continues to do so.

When I was old enough to date, things had changed a bit. The same racial rules applied – I was black because I didn’t look white – so I too was expected to turn down the advances of white boys.  It was the timing in the history of American race relations that made what I did necessary, in my mind.  I dated boys who asked me out.  It didn’t matter to me what color their skin was.  It most certainly did matter to their parents, though.  More often than not, our childish plans were shot down from incoming parenting.

I noticed, however, that my mother seemed far happier about the attention I got from white boys than from black boys.  By this time I had built up a head of resentment toward my mother that pervaded my existence.  The darker the boys skin was, the less she’d approve of them (although she never admitted that was the reason,) so I started deliberately befriending very dark and not so attractive boys, just to get under my mother’s alabaster skin!

Over the years, I have never stopped pointing out her hypocrisy to her – sometimes loudly and disrespectfully.  However, I have also come to understand how she could have turned out the way she did, so I try harder to tolerate her lapses in racial judgment.  In fact, I thought I had trained her pretty well to at least try to hide her prejudice…

…until I learned recently what she had said to my son about 15 years ago when he took his gorgeous Haitian/Italian girlfriend to visit his grandmother.  He told me she pulled him aside and told him he was doing great in the girlfriend department. “Don’t be bringing any darkies home.”

My son hasn’t had much to say to his grandmother since that day.  He was shocked and more than a little outraged.  He doesn’t understand how a woman who married four black men, who raised two black daughters and whose grandfather was “as black as the Ace of Spades” could say such a thing.

Neither do I, but she did.  That’s my Mama.

 

*The surname has been changed to protect my mother’s privacy.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

But, Think of the Kids!

 

That was the most frequent verbalized objection to interracial mating when I was coming up in the 50s and 60s.  You might not have heard it recently, if ever.  Probably because it didn’t work.

Try as they might, the proponents of racial purity (except when it involved Asian women, who were considered acceptable, for whatever reason) – despite their desperate efforts, white people continued to find people of a different race, including blacks, with whom they made babies.

I’ve been thinking a lot about this subject this week.  Yes, the Cheerios commercial again.  Not the commercial, so much as the continued conversation about the racist rants that appeared under it in the YouTube comments section. Actually, I have been thinking about it all my life because all those warnings I heard, which were either too late for my parents to hear or too stupid for them to concern themselves with, had me poised to spend a lifetime being treated like scum on the bottoms of the “pure-raced” people’s shoes.

Did I have problems because of my mix-matched (in more ways than just race! – but that’s another post) parents?  Sure did.  You all know I did.  Just as I would have had a problem if I had red hair, or freckles, or a club foot, or too much flesh regardless of its color.

I think that refrain turned out to be a bunch of crap.  As usual, when people protest on behalf of some unknown possibility, it usually means they are thinking something completely different; such as envisioning their pure-as-the-driven-snow daughters wrapped in the ebony arms of some “black buck.” 

Black parents often said the exact same thing:  what about the kids? Just as there are today, there were most certainly anti-white black people, just on general principle. But back then the main concern was the blowback the black parents’ themselves, their children and their grandchildren would get from the society at large. And it would come from both sides of the color line, too.

Not only do I think those warnings were absolutely baseless; the truth is that those mixed-raced children have access to a special set of advantages neither their white nor their black contemporaries can access.

Perspective - There is a unique opportunity for the children who have the benefit of growing up around members of both parents’ families to learn the true elements of each family’s culture.  They have a bird’s-eye seat and can draw their own conclusions about what is true and what is not true inside the omnipresent stereotypes.  Obviously, when one parent is not involved in the child’s life at all – which, unfortunately happens all too often – then the child absorbs the culture of the custodial parent. 

We all know that our President, Barack Obama, had an absentee African father.  Young Barack was raised by his white mother at first;  his mother and an Indonesian stepfather for awhile; and finally by his beloved white grandparents.

Exoticism – Although most black people pride themselves at being able to “see” the black in any mixed-race person, no matter how much their Caucasian side dominates, non-black people don’t seem to have that skill.  Before they assume a person is part black, they will guess just about every other possible combination first.  Then they are likely to ask “What Are You?”  There was a time I would pretend not to understand the question.  I might even answer something obnoxious like “human” or “female.”  When I moved to San Francisco from Chicago in 1978, my co-workers stared at me surreptitiously (well, not really – I saw them) for weeks.  Finally, a man walked up to my desk and said “What the hell are you?  Chinese?” That was a first!

Even today, when people who are not prejudiced against intermarriage are discussing the possibility of a union between a man and a woman of different races you might hear this:  “They would have such beautiful children.”  I have yet to find a person who doesn’t think the blend of races produces some exceptionally interesting-looking kids.

AdaptabilitySome people feel extremely uncomfortable about being the only person in a room of a different race or nationality than the others.  Mixed-race people are almost always in that situation, so there is little discomfort, at least not from the racial angle.  A shy person will feel uncomfortable, regardless of race, but a confident person can still feel like a fish out of water if surrounded by a crowd of people of a different race.

Did you ever wonder where Mr. President learned his undeniably black speech patterns and his Joe-cool swagger? He certainly didn’t learn it in Hawaii at the private schools he attended.  A quick look at the class pictures below will attest to the fact that he was isolated in terms of his blackness.  Obama elementary school class pictureObama high school class picture

Obama struggled with his identity, though, even in Honolulu,  one of the most diverse cities in America, because only 2% of the population was black in that city as recently as 2011. In his later teens he sought out the company of black Americans by hanging out with the black students at the University of Hawaii. 

I guarantee you, “Barry” Obama did not sound like either version of the President today.  He cultivated that persona.  He learned to “code-switch”, a phenomenon that has been frequently remarked upon since he has been President.  He most definitely does speak very differently when his audience’s majority is black than when he is addressing a majority-white audience.  He has honed a variety of codes as a result of his diverse exposure to international cultures. What he seems to have made the most habitual is the “code” he learned during his days on the South Side of Chicago.  He even picked up the Chicago Pimp Walk!

Almost every person I know who has at least one black parent has learned to code-switch, and so do I.  In my case it is probably a lot more subtle than President Obama’s, but I know without a doubt I could do it his way if pressed.  Most people have some level of code-switching, influenced by things such as their home town upbringing, their country, state or city or origin, etc.

Neither President Obama nor I were emotionally scarred by the simple, racial circumstances of our births. Missing fathers, adolescent angst, losses in competitions ( we share a similar sense of competition)?  Maybe.  But our admixture of ancestry has done far more to propel us to whatever level of success we’ve had – obviously, “Barry” beat my socks off on that one – than it ever did to harm us.

OPEN CALL

There are a number of people who read and comment on this blogging site who are members of mixed-race families.  I have shared my own individual perspective on the subject.  I would love to hear what the rest of you have to share.

This video I found on YouTube ought to get your juices flowing:

Monday, June 3, 2013

Out of the Sewer, Into the Light

 

sewer rats

The Cheerios people probably never dreamed their latest 30-second spot would do what it’s done.  Sure, they found a suitably toned, curly-haired cutie pie to play the star role designed to depict the bridging of the racial gap.  But I’ll bet my last paltry Social Security check they never expected to become exterminators.

The sometimes open sewer that is social media can certainly be disconcerting.  The stench from the Twittersphere is often unbearable. But there is an equally compelling case to be made for the efficacy of today's social media channels, which seem to act as a virtual laxative for hateful people who love to hide behind their laptops. 

The truth is, the Facebooks and Twitters have helped massive groups of people do things unheard of just a quarter of a century ago. 

Using social media, bank customers told the Bank of America “Oh, HELL no!” when they tried to charge them for using their debit cards. 

Smart phone cameras and instant connections to one's social media of choice have brought to the world the un-sanitized truth about the slaughters of everyday citizens throughout the world before the official media have had a chance to edit their wire feeds.

And lately, during the resurgence of rabid, rampant, in-your-face racism, the intellectually challenged scumbags of the nation are being outed in real time for all the world to see.  And they are doing it to themselves.

Thanks to our twice-elected bi-racial President, gone are the suspicions of whispered nastiness going on behind closed doors, closed country clubs and closed-minded gatherings of the terminally bigoted.  We don’t have to suspect anymore; we KNOW because the TBs are falling over themselves to out-nasty one another – in virtual public.

The social sewer rats of America, those people who have found a way to make a commercial about love into fodder for their fiendish hatred, are in an unforgiving, high-definition spotlight that is helping to expose the underground barriers to any delusions one might have had about living in a post-racial society. 

When I started this post I had intended to highlight some of the disgustingly ignorant comments among the thousands (perhaps millions?)posted since the commercial depicting an interracial family aired last Tuesday, but there are far too many to try to single out a few.  If you are curious, go to YouTube, select one that is responding to the ad, and knock yourself out.  You will probably feel the need to shower afterwards.

Unlike so many who are disgusted and discouraged by this outpouring of stupid, I see it a little differently.  Because of social media, many, many  more people will be exposed to the reality of racism in America.  Before they smarten up enough to understand that they are facilitating a kind of self-implosion, they will have gone and done the one thing they never meant to do. 

Sewer rats hate daylight.

If you haven’t seen it yet, here is the “offending” catalyst for this latest display of “enlightenment.”

To their credit, General Mills, the company behind Cheerios, said today they will not bend to the negative pressure.

Because of social media, many, many  more people will be exposed to the reality of racism in America.  Before they smarten up enough to understand that they are facilitating a kind of self-implosion, they will have gone and done the one thing they never meant to do. 

Sewer rats hate daylight.

If you haven’t seen it yet, here is the “offending” catalyst for this latest display of “enlightenment.”

To their credit, General Mills, the company behind Cheerios, said today they will not bend to the negative pressure.